GMC: Confidentiality: disclosing information about serious communicable diseases: Summary

SJT Textbook: Confidentiality — Disclosing Information About Serious Communicable Diseases

Serious Communicable Diseases and Confidentiality – MSRA SJT

This serious communicable diseases and confidentiality MSRA SJT guide explains when disclosure is legally required, justified in the public interest, and how doctors must act to prevent serious infectious harm.

Start the full MSRA SJT learning hub here → https://www.passthemsra.com/courses/msra-sjt-textbook/

In serious communicable diseases and confidentiality, preventing harm to others can lawfully override patient consent.

🎥 Video Lesson (YouTube)

🎧 Podcast Lesson (Spotify / Apple / Amazon)

GMC Serious Communicable Diseases Disclosure: Core Principles

🎯 THE CORE PRINCIPLE

Serious communicable diseases raise complex confidentiality decisions. While trust and privacy are vital, doctors must share information when legally required, when essential for direct care, and when necessary to prevent serious harm to others. The SJT focuses heavily on proportionate disclosure, justified public-interest decisions, contact tracing responsibilities, safeguarding concerns, and safe practice after occupational exposures.

High-scoring answers demonstrate:

* minimal but necessary disclosure
* lawful compliance
* clear justification
* prompt action in high-risk situations
* safeguarding vulnerable adults and children
* supporting patients to inform contacts
* acting transparently and respectfully

Low-scoring answers conceal risk, breach confidentiality unnecessarily, delay disclosure, or fail to act in serious risk situations.

The MSRA SJT tests serious communicable diseases and confidentiality through public-interest disclosure and notifiable disease reporting.

🧩 KEY PRINCIPLES (MSRA SJT Interpretation)

1. Confidentiality is essential — but serious harm overrides it

Core idea: Maintain confidentiality unless disclosure is required by law or justified to prevent serious harm. Exam cues:

* Imminent risk to others
* Significant risk of transmission
* Patient refusal with ongoing risk High-yield rule:
* If not disclosing creates serious risk → disclose proportionately.

2. Follow the law: report notifiable diseases

Core idea: Legal reporting duties override consent. Examples: TB, measles, HIV (in specific public health contexts), other notifiable infections. Exam principle:

* “Comply with statutory reporting immediately” is always correct.

3. Seek consent where possible — but don’t delay essential disclosure

Core idea: Consent should be attempted unless impractical or unsafe. Exam cues:

* Patient unconscious/incapacitated
* Contact tracing urgency
* Needlestick injuries High-yield:
* Seek consent → if refused and serious risk persists → disclose in public interest.

4. Use minimum necessary disclosure

Core idea: Only share what is essential. Exam cues:

* Redact unnecessary detail
* Inform only those who need to protect themselves or deliver care Red flags:
* Revealing diagnosis to those without valid need
* Broad disclosures to large groups

5. Protect healthcare workers (e.g. needlestick injuries)

Core idea: Act fast to reduce occupational harm. Exam cues:

* Immediate risk assessment
* Early testing
* Attempt patient consent for disclosure
* If unavailable → disclose in public interest High-yield rule:
* Timely risk assessment always outranks confidentiality delays.

6. Informing people at risk

Core idea: Encourage patients to tell close contacts; disclose directly if they refuse and serious harm persists. Exam cues:

* Sexual partners
* Household members
* Needle-sharing contacts High-yield:
* “Support patient to inform contacts” > “Doctor directly discloses”
* But if ongoing risk → doctor can disclose minimally.

7. Vulnerable adults and safeguarding

Core idea: Safeguarding duties override confidentiality. Exam cues:

* Adults lacking capacity
* Coercion or exploitation
* Unsafe households High-yield:
* Escalate to safeguarding teams without delay.

8. Children and young people at risk

Core idea: Children’s safety is paramount. Exam cues:

* Testing children at risk
* Parental refusal to protect them
* Disclosure to protect children High-yield:
* Safeguarding > parental confidentiality

9. Anonymised information when full disclosure is unnecessary

Core idea: Use anonymisation for public health surveillance or when identification isn’t needed. Exam cues:

* Public health teams
* Academic or epidemiological data High-yield:
* Anonymise routinely unless identity is essential for safety or law.

10. Recording communicable diseases accurately

Core idea: If a communicable disease contributed to death → record it appropriately. Exam cues:

* Transparency
* Public health responsibilities

Serious communicable diseases and confidentiality decisions must always follow GMC legal and safeguarding standards.

⚡ HIGH-YIELD ACTIONS (What Scores Points)

1. Seek patient consent where safe and feasible.
2. Disclose the minimum information required to prevent serious harm.
3. Comply with statutory reporting duties without delay.
4. Conduct urgent risk assessments after needlestick injuries.
5. Support patients to inform their contacts; disclose if they refuse and risk remains.
6. Follow public health and infection control policies.
7. Escalate safeguarding concerns for vulnerable adults and children.
8. Document decisions and rationale clearly.
9. Maintain secure handling of infection-related information.
10. Seek senior/public health advice when in doubt.

Occupational exposure scenarios frequently assess serious communicable diseases and confidentiality principles.

Common traps: excessive privacy protecting unsafe situations, oversharing, delaying, or ignoring legal duties.

Safeguarding duties are central to serious communicable diseases and confidentiality in vulnerable adults and children.

💬 MODEL PHRASES (Use These in SJT Logic)

* “I will seek consent where possible but prioritise safety.”
* “I will comply with statutory reporting requirements.”
* “I will ensure an urgent risk assessment after exposure.”
* “I will support the patient in informing close contacts.”
* “I will escalate safeguarding concerns immediately.”

Doctors must balance trust with safety in serious communicable diseases and confidentiality cases.

R – Report notifiable diseases
I – Immediate action after exposure
S – Serious harm overrides confidentiality
K – Keep disclosure to minimum necessary
S – Support patient to inform contacts
A – Anonymise unless identity is essential
F – Follow safeguarding rules
E – Explain decisions and document

Oversharing breaches serious communicable diseases and confidentiality even when infection risk is present.

📋 QUICK FAQ

Is confidentiality absolute in communicable disease cases?
No — safety, public interest, and law can override it. Must you report notifiable diseases?
Yes, immediately — consent is not required. Should patients be asked to inform contacts first?
Yes, but if risk persists → disclose minimally. What about needlestick injuries?
Act immediately; attempt consent, but disclose in public interest if needed. When can you disclose without consent?
Legal obligation, serious harm to others, safeguarding.

📚 GMC ANCHOR POINTS

* Confidentiality (communicable diseases)
* Legal duties: notifiable diseases
* Public interest disclosures
* Safeguarding children and adults
* Occupational safety (needlestick injuries)
* Minimal, proportionate disclosure
* Public health responsibilities

💡 MINI PRACTICE SCENARIO

A doctor sustains a needlestick injury from a patient with suspected HIV. The patient is unconscious and cannot consent to disclosure of their status. Best action: Perform urgent risk assessment; disclose relevant information to protect the injured doctor, justified under public interest and safety. Why: Immediate risk outweighs confidentiality; delay could cause serious harm.

🎯 KEY TAKEAWAYS

✓ Confidentiality is essential, but serious risk overrides it.
✓ Notifiable diseases must be reported immediately.
✓ Seek consent but don’t delay when safety is at stake.
✓ Support patient-led disclosure; disclose minimally if they refuse.
✓ Urgently assess occupational exposures.
✓ Safeguard children and vulnerable adults.
✓ Use minimal, secure disclosure and document decisions.
✓ Public interest decisions must be proportionate and justified.

🔗 RELATED TOPICS

* → Public interest and confidentiality
* → Safeguarding (adults and children)
* → Notifiable diseases reporting
* → Occupational exposure management
* → Disclosing without consent
* → Communicating difficult information

📖 FULL PRACTICE QUESTIONS

Example SJT — Best of 3 (8 options; choose three)

A patient with confirmed TB refuses to allow disclosure of their diagnosis to a close household contact who is immunosuppressed. You are concerned the contact is at serious risk.

Options:
A. Encourage the patient to inform the contact
B. Disclose the minimum necessary information to the contact
C. Respect confidentiality and do nothing
D. Document the refusal and escalate to public health
E. Wait until the next clinic appointment
F. Inform safeguarding if the contact is vulnerable
G. Discuss the case with public health for advice
H. Tell other patients on the ward for awareness

Example SJT — Rank 5 (best → worst)

You learn that a patient with HIV refuses to inform their long-term partner. The partner is unaware and at risk.

Options:
A. Encourage the patient strongly to disclose
B. Seek senior/public health advice
C. Disclose directly to the partner without telling the patient
D. Respect confidentiality because the patient has refused
E. Review at the next routine appointment