SJT Textbook: Confidentiality — Reporting Gunshot & Knife Wounds

GMC Reporting Gunshot and Knife Wounds
GMC reporting gunshot and knife wounds – MSRA SJT revision guide on when to notify police, what to disclose, and how to protect public safety.
🎥 Video Lesson (YouTube)
🎧 Podcast Lesson (Spotify / Apple / Amazon)
🎯 THE CORE PRINCIPLE
Gunshot and knife wounds often signal serious violent crime with immediate risk of further harm. Doctors must balance confidentiality with the public interest in preventing violence. The GMC requires clinicians to notify police of gunshot wounds and non-accidental knife wounds, even if personal details are not initially shared. Identifiable information should be disclosed only when necessary to prevent serious harm, investigate a serious crime, or when the patient consents.
The MSRA SJT tests whether candidates follow the correct steps: prioritise patient care, make the required initial notification, assess risk, attempt consent before disclosing identifiable details, maintain proportionality, and document all decisions. Safeguarding concerns, especially in children and young people, must trigger escalation.
GMC reporting gunshot and knife wounds prioritises public safety over absolute confidentiality.
🧩 KEY PRINCIPLES (MSRA SJT Interpretation)
1. Initial notification to police is required
Core idea: Gunshot wounds and non-accidental knife wounds must be reported to police immediately. What the SJT tests:
* Calling police without delaying clinical care
* Sharing non-identifiable information initially
* Prioritising patient safety during acute management High-yield rule:
* “Inform police promptly” is nearly always correct.
2. Confidentiality remains important — limit identifiable details
Core idea: Initial contact does not require disclosure of identity. Exam cues:
* Provide statistical/basic information first
* Determine necessity before revealing identifiers
* Document rationale High-yield:
* Identity is disclosed only if justified (consent, public interest, or legal request).
3. Patient care always comes first
Core idea: Stabilise the patient before administrative communication. Red flags:
* Delaying resuscitation to contact police
* Moving patient for interviews during acute distress
4. Consent should be sought for identifiable disclosure
Core idea: Patients should be asked whether they are willing to speak with police or consent to disclosure. Exam cues:
* Respect refusal unless serious risk persists
* Explain why police are involved
5. Public interest may justify disclosure without consent
Core idea: Identifiable information can be disclosed if:
* serious crime is involved
* there is risk of further violence
* disclosure helps prevent harm Examples:
* Violent attack suspected
* Firearm-related crime
* Gang retaliation risk
6. Knife wounds from accidents or self-harm
Core idea: Accidental or self-inflicted knife wounds do not need police notification unless safeguarding concerns exist. High-yield:
* “Not required” unless doubt about cause or child protection risk.
7. In uncertain injury patterns — seek senior advice
Core idea: If the cause of the wound is unclear, involve senior clinicians before deciding. Exam cues:
* Consultant involvement
* Organsational safeguarding teams
8. Safeguarding children & young people
Core idea: Any gunshot or knife wound in under-18s raises safeguarding concerns. Exam cues:
* Safeguarding referral
* MDT involvement
* Police involvement if required
9. Document everything
Core idea: Record reasons for disclosure or non-disclosure, attempts to seek consent, and discussions with police. High-yield:
* Detailed documentation strengthens justification and continuity.
MSRA SJT frequently tests errors in GMC reporting gunshot and knife wounds.1. Stabilise the patient before any administrative tasks.
2. Notify police immediately for gunshot and non-accidental knife wounds.
3. Share only non-identifiable information initially.
4. Seek patient consent for identifiable disclosure.
5. If consent refused → weigh public interest and risk to others.
6. Disclose identifiable information if serious harm is likely.
7. In uncertain cases → seek consultant/senior advice.
8. Escalate all under-18 cases to safeguarding teams.
9. Document consent discussions and reasoning clearly.
10. Respect confidentiality for accidental/self-inflicted knife wounds unless safeguarding is needed.
* Disclosing full identity without justification
* Ignoring serious risk of further violence
* Delaying emergency treatment for police involvement
* Not escalating safeguarding concerns in children
* Assuming wounds are accidental without assessment
* Failing to document reasons for disclosure
* Allowing police access to patients without consent when unsafe
These traps prioritise confidentiality over safety or encourage unnecessary disclosure.
Failure to follow GMC reporting gunshot and knife wounds guidance risks serious professional sanction.
💬 MODEL PHRASES (Use These in SJT Logic)
* “I will notify the police with non-identifiable information initially.”
* “I will seek the patient’s consent to disclose identifiable details.”
* “I will disclose minimally and proportionately where justified.”
* “I will involve senior clinicians when the cause is unclear.”
* “I will escalate safeguarding concerns immediately.”
W – Warn police of gunshot/non-accidental knife wounds
O – Obtain consent for identifiable disclosure
U – Urgent treatment first
N – Non-identifiable info initially
D – Document decisions clearly
S – Safeguarding for under-18s
A – Assess risk of further harm
F – Follow public interest rules
E – Escalate uncertainties to seniors
GMC reporting gunshot and knife wounds allows anonymised initial police notification.
Stabilise → ensure patient safety.
Notify police of gunshot/non-accidental knife wounds.
Provide non-identifiable info first.
Seek consent for further disclosure.
If risk of serious harm → disclose minimally.
Escalate safeguarding concerns.
Document rationale thoroughly.
📋 QUICK FAQ
Do all knife wounds need to be reported?
No — only non-accidental ones. Self-harm or accidental injuries do not require notification unless safeguarding concerns exist. Do you need consent to notify police?
No for the initial notification. Consent is needed for identifiable disclosure unless justified by public interest. When is disclosure without consent appropriate?
Serious risk, further violence expected, serious crime involved. What if the patient refuses police involvement?
You still notify police of the wound; identifiable disclosure depends on risk assessment. What about children and young people?
Always raise safeguarding concerns.
📚 GMC ANCHOR POINTS
* Confidentiality guidance (violence and reporting)
* Public interest disclosure
* Safeguarding children and vulnerable adults
* Serious crime prevention
* Documentation and justification
* Minimum necessary disclosure
💡 MINI PRACTICE SCENARIO
A 17-year-old presents with a stab wound and insists it was an accident. The explanation seems inconsistent, and the parent appears evasive. Best action: Treat the wound, notify police (non-accidental knife wound likely), and make an urgent safeguarding referral. Why: Risk to a minor, potential abuse, and public safety concerns justify disclosure.
🎯 KEY TAKEAWAYS
✓ Notify police for gunshot and non-accidental knife wounds.
✓ Stabilise the patient before administrative tasks.
✓ Initial disclosure need not identify the patient.
✓ Seek consent where possible before giving identifiable details.
✓ Disclose without consent if serious risk persists.
✓ Safeguard children and vulnerable adults.
✓ Avoid oversharing and over-disclosure.
✓ Document decisions thoroughly.
🔗 RELATED TOPICS
* → Public interest disclosure
* → Serious communicable diseases
* → Safeguarding (children & adults)
* → Violence and abuse
* → Confidentiality without consent
* → Working with police and authorities
📖 FULL PRACTICE QUESTIONS
Example SJT — Best of 3 (8 options; choose three)
A young adult arrives with a gunshot wound. The patient is stable and refuses to allow you to speak to the police.
Options:
A. Stabilise and treat the patient first
B. Notify police of the wound without giving identity
C. Respect confidentiality and take no action
D. Seek patient consent to disclose identifiable details
E. Document refusal and reasoning
F. Disclose identifiable details immediately
G. Allow police to interview the patient mid-treatment
H. Escalate to senior colleague
Correct three: A, B, D
• A: Treatment always comes first.
• B: Initial notification required.
• D: Consent should be sought before identifiable disclosure.
Why others are weaker/wrong:
• E/H: Reasonable but not top priorities in *initial* management.
• C/F/G: Unsafe, disproportionate, or harmful.
Example SJT — Rank 5 (best → worst)
A man arrives with a suspected assault-related knife wound. He insists it was an accident. The story is inconsistent.
Options:
A. Notify police of a possible non-accidental knife wound
B. Treat the wound first and ensure safety
C. Seek senior clinical advice
D. Accept the explanation and take no further action
E. Wait until the patient leaves to decide
Ideal order: B (1) > A (2) > C (3) > E (4) > D (5)
• B: Treatment first.
• A: Reporting obligation.
• C: Important if uncertainty persists.
• E: Delay is unsafe.
• D: Fails to assess risk properly.
