Conflict of Interest

Conflict of Interest MSRA SJT

This conflict of interest MSRA SJT guide explains how declared and perceived conflicts must be managed to protect fairness, transparency, and patient trust.

🎥 Video Lesson (YouTube)

🎧 Podcast Lesson (Spotify / Apple / Amazon)

📍 EXAM MINDSET
Even the appearance of bias is enough — declare it, avoid influence on care, and protect trust.

🎯 THE CORE PRINCIPLE

A conflict of interest (COI) exists when personal, financial, relational, or organisational interests could influence — or be seen to influence — clinical judgement.

In the SJT, you score for:

• recognising conflicts early
• declaring them transparently
• stepping back from decision-making
• ensuring unbiased options and fair choice
• documenting clearly

Trust and fairness outrank convenience or organisational targets.

Perceived conflicts are treated the same as actual conflicts in conflict of interest MSRA SJT questions.

⚡ HIGH-YIELD ACTIONS (What Scores Points)

1. Identify the actual or perceived conflict (financial stake, family link, private work, pharma hospitality).
2. Declare openly to patients, colleagues, and/or your organisation.
3. Step back from the decision where feasible; arrange an alternative clinician.
4. Provide balanced information on all suitable options (including NHS and private).
5. Record the conflict, information given, and the plan.
6. Follow NHS gifts/COI policies (registers, declarations, limits).
7. Prioritise patient fairness over personal or organisational benefit.
8. Avoid biased recommendations, even unintentionally.

🚨 RED FLAGS (Act Immediately)
• Recommending a service where you or a relative has a financial interest
• Gifts, hospitality, or sponsorship linked to prescribing or referrals
• Being pressured to meet revenue/target-driven pathways
• Failure to declare interests affecting options presented
• Concealing conflicts (“I’ll stay objective, no need to declare”)
• Making decisions that could benefit you personally
TRAP ANSWERS (Decoy Detectors)
Trap Answer Why It Tanks Your Score
“I’ll stay objective — no need to declare.” Ignores the appearance of bias; trust eroded.
“Accept small gifts quietly.” Breaches COI/gifts policy; lacks transparency.
“Recommend my own service first.” Hidden personal gain; unfair to patient.
“Only present NHS/private options selectively.” Withholds fair alternatives; biased decision.

Always reject concealment, selective information, or decisions influenced by benefit to you or your organisation.

💬 MODEL PHRASES (Use These in SJT Logic)

* “I need to declare a potential conflict and step back from this decision.”
* “For transparency, I have a connection to that provider — equivalent NHS options are available.”
* “I’ll document our discussion and arrange an unbiased clinician to continue the conversation.”
* “We need to follow gifts and sponsorship policy to ensure prescribing remains impartial.”

🧠 MEMORY AID
CLEAR

Confess (declare) • Limit influence • Explain transparently • Alternatives offered • Record

🏃 EXAM SPEEDRUN
1
Spot the conflict.
2
Declare it immediately.
3
Step back and avoid influence.
4
Offer unbiased alternatives.
5
Record actions and plan.

📋 QUICK FAQ

Is a perceived conflict enough to declare?
Yes — the appearance of bias is enough to damage trust.

What if I’m the only available clinician?
Declare, provide balanced options, document, and seek second opinion ASAP.

Can I accept hospitality or “education sessions”?
Only if compliant with policy and recorded — never if linked to prescribing/referrals.

Do I have to mention private options?
Yes — provide fair information. If you can’t remain impartial, step back.

Should organisational pressure influence decisions?
No — patient interest always overrides targets.

Early declaration is central to conflict of interest MSRA SJT scoring.

📚 GMC ANCHOR POINTS

• Do not allow financial or other interests to affect care (GMP 2024).
• Maintain honesty, integrity, and trust at all times.
• Be open about financial/commercial arrangements (GMC COI guidance).
• Keep accurate records of conflicts and actions taken.
• Ensure patients receive fair, unbiased information about alternatives.

Biased referrals score poorly in conflict of interest MSRA SJT scenarios.

💡 MINI PRACTICE SCENARIO

You work part-time at a private imaging centre. A patient asks for advice on scan options during your NHS clinic.

Best action: Explain your connection, give balanced NHS and private options, and offer a colleague to discuss further.

Why: Declares conflict, prevents influence, protects fairness.

Stepping back from decisions is a core principle in conflict of interest MSRA SJT.

🎯 KEY TAKEAWAYS

✓ Perceived conflicts count
✓ Declare early and openly
✓ Step back from decisions
✓ Ensure fair, unbiased alternatives
✓ Document everything clearly

Accurate documentation protects doctors in conflict of interest MSRA SJT cases.

🔗 RELATED TOPICS

* → Maintaining Professional Boundaries
* → Resource Allocation & Fairness
* → Speaking Up / Whistleblowing

📖 FULL PRACTICE QUESTIONS

Example SJT — Best of 3 (8 options; choose three)

Scenario: You work part-time for a private provider offering a test similar to your NHS service. A patient asks for your recommendation.

Options A–H
A. Recommend the private test and only disclose if asked
B. Explain your connection, offer balanced NHS and private options, and offer an alternative clinician
C. Present only NHS options
D. Recommend the private provider because it’s faster
E. Record the conflict and actions in the notes
F. Accept a hosted education lunch from the provider
G. Book the private test now and document later
H. Ask the staff WhatsApp group how to handle this

👆 Click to reveal correct three

Correct three: B, E, C

• B: Full transparency + balanced information + separation from the decision.
• E: Creates documented accountability.
• C: If impartiality is compromised, avoid private recommendation and step back.

Why others are weaker/wrong:
• A/D/G: Non-transparent or biased.
• F: Hospitality influencing care.
• H: Unprofessional and confidentiality-risk.


Example SJT — Rank 5 (best → worst)

Scenario: You’re asked to refer a patient to a centre in which your partner owns shares; an equivalent NHS pathway exists.

Options A–E
A. Declare conflict, offer NHS alternative, and arrange a colleague to complete referral
B. Refer to the shareholder centre because it has earlier slots
C. Tell the patient about the interest but still recommend the shareholder centre
D. Avoid declaring because you believe you can stay objective
E. Ask admin to book the shareholder centre quietly, then document later

👆 Click to reveal ideal order

Ideal order: A (1) > C (2) > B (3) > E (4) > D (5)

• A: Full transparency + alternatives + stepping back = best practice.
• C: Partial transparency but still biased.
• B: No declaration; convenience-based.
• E: Conceals bias and delays documentation.
• D: Denies conflict — worst.

📦 QUICK-REFERENCE CARD (Screenshot/Print)
CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Flag conflict early

Declare transparently

Step back from decisions

Offer fair alternatives

Honestly record actions
RED FLAGS

Financial interest

Family relationship

Gifts/hospitality

Target pressure
MEMORY AID
CLEAR
Confess • Limit influence • Explain • Alternatives • Record